July 2, 2026 - Co-reasoning

Co-reasoning Not opinion, but meaning seeking. So, I find it pretty interesting to always attempt to find a way of how a concept could be thought together with another person. Not just share the opinion about the concept or try to “defend” or “attack” it, but truly ask, what does that mean, why is it there, how do we understand it, and so on. Many questions could be obviously asked, for that we also need to understand how to ask questions or at least attempt to. Where we attempt of asking or doing any kind of action regardless of experience in that particular area. But this is a topic for another journal. That experience of having a conversation or connection where co-reasoning happening is something that gives a lot of energy. At least for me. The world that I experience nowadays is mostly about opinions or beliefs. “If I believe that that thing is good, then that thing is only good and couldn’t be otherwise or opposite”. Which is neither good nor bad, this is a human psychological model. This is something that was naturally developed in us, however some people are actually able to dis attach ego from the thought or/and concept and question it. It is sometimes good and sometimes bad. Now, if removing subjective opinions and start asking, why does that specific concept exist? For example Opinion Why do opinions exist? Probably because human experience reality through or according to their internal reality and shape that something to their opinion, so that will align with current model, and with some psychological and social needs where human tend to connect better just because they believe in the same thing and because of that we feel “good”, and now the chance of survival is higher. It might be wild to say “chance of survival” in 2026, because if you live in a city with all the necessities near by, we don’t really think about survival, we think about other dynamics. However people that experience crisis, war, natural disasters and etc.? Then it really changes. Also in these conditions most of the time people won’t think of a nature of a belief, they will unconsciously follow it to increase chances for survival. Now, mentioning all of that, my reasoning could be right or wrong in some parts. That is important to keep in mind as well, and wrong or right is not good or bad right away. This is just a possible reasoning for some concept. Based on how reasoning happened above, we can extract many things and ask for example why,how,when,where does human experience reality or experiencing reality at all. That little example is solo-reasoning, and the main point of this particular journal is to share an idea that conversations could be Co-reasoning sometimes, they don’t feed ego, need or any other internal psychological aspects, but they bring a chance to understand. What does it mean to understand?